Lysophosphatidic acid-mediated augmentation of cardiomyocyte lipoprotein lipase involves actin cytoskeleton reorganization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lipoprotein lipase (LPL)-augmenting property of lysophosphatidylcholine requires the formation of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) (J Mol Cell Cardiol 37: 931-938, 2004). Given that the actin cytoskeleton has been implicated in regulating cardiomyocyte LPL, we examined whether LPL secretion after LPA involves actin cytoskeleton reassembly. Incubation of myocytes with LPA (1-100 nM) increased basal and heparin-releasable LPL (HR-LPL), an effect that was independent of shifts in LPL mRNA. The influence of LPA on myocyte LPL was reflected at the coronary lumen, with substantial increases of the enzyme at this location. Incubation of myocytes with cytochalasin D not only blocked LPA-induced augmentation of HR-LPL but also abrogated filamentous actin formation. These effects of LPA were likely receptor mediated. Exposure of myocytes to LPA facilitated significant membrane translocation of RhoA and its downstream effector Rho kinase I (ROCK I), and blocking this effect with Y-27632 appreciably reduced basal and HR-LPL activity. Incubation of adipose tissue with LPA also significantly enhanced basal and HR-LPL activity, suggesting that sarcomeric actin likely has a limited role in influencing the LPL secretory function of LPA in the myocyte. Comparable to LPA, hyperglycemia also caused significant membrane translocation of RhoA and ROCK I in hearts isolated from diazoxide-treated animals, effects that were abrogated using insulin. Overall, our data suggest that comparable to hyperglycemia, LPA-induced increases in cardiac LPL occurred via posttranscriptional mechanisms and processes that likely required RhoA activation and actin polymerization. Whether this increase in LPL augments triglyceride deposition in the heart leading to eventual impairment in contractile function is currently unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".