Preparation and characterization of crosslinked poly(<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>‐diethylacrylamide‐<i>co</i>‐2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) resins and their application as support in solid‐phase peptide synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Novel hydrophilic and thermosensitive poly(N,N‐diethylacrylamide‐co‐2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) resins were prepared by inverse suspension polymerization with N,N′‐methylenebis(acrylamide) as a crosslinker. The effects of chemical composition and degree of crosslinking on the polymerization were investigated. The polymer resins were characterized by elemental analysis, infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and scanning electron microscopy. The thermosensitivity of the crosslinked resins was demonstrated by their lower critical swelling temperatures. The swelling and deswelling volume of the beads in water varied depending on the molar fraction of the N,N‐diethylacrylamide. These beads swelled extensively in a variety of common solvents. They had high loadings of functional hydroxyl groups and were used as supports in the solid‐phase synthesis of an oligopeptide. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 1681–1690, 2003
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".