MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006328518 · doi:10.1603/me09223

Tick Paralysis Caused by <I>Dermacentor andersoni</I> (Acari: Ixodidae) is a Heritable Trait

2010· article· en· W2006328518 on OpenAlexaff
Tim Lysyk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Entomology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
KeywordsVirulenceBiologyIxodidaeAcariParasitiformesStrain (injury)VirologyVeterinary medicineGeneticsZoologyAnatomyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The heritability of the ability to cause paralysis was examined in crosses of virulent and avirulent Dermacentor andersoni (Stiles) (Acari: Ixodidae). Virulence was assessed using hamster bioassay. Paralysis was caused by the virulent parental strain but not by the avirulent parental strain. Four crosses were made: Avirulent female x Avirulent male (AA cross), Virulent female x Virulent male (VV cross), Avirulent female x Virulent male (AV cross), and Virulent female x Avirulent male (VA cross). The proportion of females that produced fertile egg masses was similar among the crosses; however, VV females produced fewer fertile eggs. This was attributed to the long-term laboratory colonization of the virulent strain. All crosses had similar levels of larval and nymphal engorgement and adult eclosion. The ability to cause paralysis was detected in progeny of all crosses except the AA cross. Both heterogeneous crosses caused paralysis, but the virulence was slightly less than for the VV cross. Virulence was similar among the AV and VA crosses, indicating that virulent males were as likely as females to pass the trait to progeny. Time to paralysis was faster for the VV cross compared with the heterogeneous crosses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical EntomologySame topicVector-borne infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207