The Pseudomonas aeruginosa Initiation Factor IF-2 Is Responsible for Formylation-independent Protein Initiation in P. aeruginosa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Formylation of the initiator methionyl-tRNA (Met-tRNAfMet) was generally thought to be essential for initiation of protein synthesis in all eubacteria based on studies conducted primarily in Escherichia coli. However, this view of eubacterial protein initiation has changed because some bacteria have been demonstrated to have the capacity to initiate protein synthesis with the unformylated Met-tRNAfMet. Here we show that the Pseudomonas aeruginosa initiation factor IF-2 is required for formylation-independent protein initiation in P. aeruginosa, the first bacterium shown to have the ability to initiate protein synthesis with both the initiator formyl-methionyl-tRNA (fMet-tRNAfMet) and Met-tRNAfMet. The E. coli IF-2, which participates exclusively in formylation-dependent protein initiation in E. coli, was unable to facilitate utilization of Met-tRNAfMet in initiation in P. aeruginosa. However, the E. coli IF-2 was made to function in formylation-independent protein initiation in P. aeruginosa by decreasing the positive charge potential of the cleft that binds the amino end of the amino acid attached to the tRNA. Furthermore increasing the positive charge potential of this cleft in the P. aeruginosa IF-2 prevented the protein from participating in formylation-independent protein initiation. Thus, this is the first demonstration of a eubacterial IF-2 with an inherent capacity to facilitate utilization of Met-tRNAfMet in protein initiation, discounting the dogma that eubacterial IF-2 can only allow the use of fMet-tRNAfMet in protein initiation. Furthermore these findings give important clues to the basis for discriminating the initiator Met-tRNA by IF-2 and for the evolution of alternative mechanisms for discrimination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".