Eutely, cell lineage, and fate within the ascidian larval nervous system: determinacy or to be determined?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The larval central nervous system (CNS) of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis (L., 1767) arises from an embryonic neural plate and contains sufficiently few cells, about 330, to enable definitive counts. On the basis of such counts, there is evidence both for cell constancy (eutely) in the larval CNS and for small variations in the overall numbers of cells and among defined cell types within this total. However, evidence for the range of such deviations and the existence of a true phenotypic wild type are lacking. The record of cell lineage, i.e., the mitotic ancestry of each cell, and the fates of some of these cells have recently received increased documentation in both the genus Ciona and Halocynthia roretzi (von Drasche, 1884). Relatively few generations of cells, between 10 and 14, form the entire CNS in C. intestinalis, and cell death does not occur prior to larval hatching. The tiny complement of larval CNS cells can therefore be seen as the product of a small fixed number of determinate cleavages, and variations in cell number as the product of minor deviations in this mitotic ancestry. Within these lineage records, some cell fates have already been identified, but knowledge of most is lacking because the cells lack markers or other identifying features. Nevertheless, this tiny nervous system offers the prospect that all its cells can one day be identified, and their developmental histories and larval functions analyzed, cell by cell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".