MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006413965 · doi:10.1142/s0219633614500217

First principles study on energetic, structural, and electronic properties of defective g-<font>C</font><sub>3</sub><font>N</font><sub>4</sub>-zz3 nanotubes

2014· article· en· W2006413965 on OpenAlexafffund
Seifollah Jalili, Farzad Molani, Jeremy Schofield

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMXene and MAX Phase Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoGovernment of OntarioCompute Canada
KeywordsVacancy defectAtom (system on chip)Density functional theoryNanotubeFontElectronic structureMaterials scienceRange (aeronautics)Atomic physicsCarbon nanotubeMolecular physicsChemistryCrystallographyNanotechnologyPhysicsComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The energetic, electronic and structural properties of defective g- C 3 N 4 -zz3 nanotubes are considered based on spin-polarized density-functional theory calculations. Nine basic system types with vacancy defects are characterized by their stabilization energies and band gaps. It is found that the nitrogen atom denoted as N 3 is the most favorable atom for a vacancy defect. In all cases, local bond reconstruction occurs in the presence of vacancy defects. The role of C / N bond rotations on the above properties has been also investigated. The results show that N 1– C 3 bond rotation is the most favorable rotational defect. In addition, the electronic properties of the semiconducting g- C 3 N 4 -zz3 nanotube with defects have been studied using band structure and density of states plots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Theoretical and Computational ChemistrySame topicMXene and MAX Phase MaterialsFrench-language works237,207