Comparative Long Term Immunogenicity of Two Recombinant Hepatitis B Vaccines and the Effect of a Booster Dose Given After Five Years in a Low Endemicity Country
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few data are available concerning the long term immunogenicity of the pediatric doses of hepatitis B vaccines given to preteenagers. The long term effect of the booster dose in teenagers is unknown. We evaluated the immunogenicity of 2 pediatric hepatitis vaccines after primary vaccination and after a booster dose. METHODS: A prospective 15-year follow-up study of the immunogenicity of 2 hepatitis B vaccines was initiated in 1995 in Quebec City, Canada. One year apart, 1129 children 8-10 years old received Engerix-B 10 microg (EB), and 1126 received Recombivax-HB 2.5 microg (RB) vaccine after a 0-, 1-, 6-month schedule. After 5 years, one-third of the 2 cohorts were randomly selected. A booster dose of EB 10 microg or RB 5 microg was administered according to the vaccine used in the primary immunization. Antibodies were measured before, 1 month after and 1 year after the booster injection. RESULTS: Before the booster dose, anti-HB surface antibody (HBs) was detected in 94.7% of the EB subjects and in 95.2% of the RB subjects (P = 0.85). The geometric mean titer (GMT) was higher in the EB than in the RB group (252 mIU/mL versus 66 mIU/mL, P < 0.0001). One month after the booster, 99.7% of subjects in the EB group and 99.6% in the RB group had a detectable anti-HBs, and 99.0 and 99.3%, respectively, had anti-HBs > or =10 mIU/mL. The anti-HBs GMT was 113,201 mIU/mL in the EB and 16,623 mIU/mL in the RB groups (P < 0.0001). One year after the booster, 99.3% of subjects in the EB group and 100% in the RB group had detectable anti-HBs, and 97.9 and 98.5% respectively, had anti-HBs > or =10 mIU/mL. The anti-HBs GMT was 14,028 mIU/mL in the EB and 3437 mIU/mL in the RB group (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The immunity persists for at least 5 years after the primary vaccination with both pediatric vaccines in 99% of children vaccinated at the age of 8-10 years. It confirms that no booster is needed at that point.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".