MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006511556 · doi:10.1117/12.513993

Time-domain modeling and simulation of the broadband behavior of semiconductor optical amplifiers

2003· article· en· W2006511556 on OpenAlexaff
Xun Li, Jongwoon Park

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime domainOptical amplifierPhysicsAmplifierNoise (video)BroadbandElectronic engineeringNoise temperatureComputational physicsOpticsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)EngineeringLaserPhase noise

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unlike semiconductor lasers that always operate within a narrow band in frequency domain, semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) normally operate in a much broader area. The noise characteristic is also crucial for amplifier design. The study of the dynamic interaction among the signal channels and noise in SOAs is therefore highly demanded. In this work, a time-domain model is implemented based on the combination of the traveling wave equation, the effective Bloch equation and the modified carrier rate equation. The optical field propagation is described by the traveling wave equation. The interaction between the optical field and the polarization is treated by the effective Bloch equation hence both homogeneous and inhomogeneous gain broadenings over the entire operating frequency range is naturally considered. Finally, the carrier rate equation is modified to make the model self-sustaining. This model has the spontaneous emission noise incorporated hence effects such as noise introduced gain saturation, beatings among different signal channels and the noise are all captured. The key feature of this model is its capability of handling the signal-signal and the signal-noise indirect and direct interactions, generated by the mutual power saturation and the spectral hole burning (SHB), respectively. This model is implemented and validated through comparisons, and is also applied for the simulation of a typical SOA with an assumed operating condition that can hardly be treated accurately by other existing models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207