MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006545951 · doi:10.1071/rdv24n1ab228

228 DOMINANT FOLLICLE ABLATION IMPROVES SUPEROVULATORY RESPONSE AND EMBRYO YIELD IN BUFFALOES SUBJECTED TO INTEGRATED SINGLE-OVULATION EMBRYO TRANSFER–MULTIPLE-OVULATION EMBRYO TRANSFER PROGRAM

2011· article· en· W2006545951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Inderjeet Singh, Rakesh Sharma, S. K. Phulia, Dharmendra Kumar, O. Saxena, Rajesh Verma, Sudhir Khanna

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvulationEstrous cycleEmbryo transferFollicular phaseEmbryoFollicleAndrologyMedicineInternal medicineBiologyEndocrinologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effect of the removal of inhibitory consequences of a dominant follicle (DF) on the recruitment, growth and ovulation of follicles in cyclic buffaloes induced to superovulate, was evaluated. Eight elite, multiparous, donor Murrah buffaloes, 80 to 120 days postpartum, were included in an integrated single-ovulation embryo transfer–multiple-ovulation embryo transfer (SOET-MOET) schedule. Superovulation with FSH (Folltropin® NIH-FSH-P1, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, ON, Canada) was preceded by nonsurgical single embryo (SOET) recovery on Day 5 or 6 after prostaglandin F2a (Lutalyse®, Pfizer, Madison, NJ, USA)-induced oestrus and AI (Day 0). For MOET, Folltropin was administered from Day 9 p.m. through to Day 13 p.m. in a twice-daily descending dose schedule (0–5, 5–4, 4–3, 3–2, 2–1 mL; total dose of 580 mg of NIH-FSH-P1). A dose of 25 mg of Lutalyse was administered on Day 12 a.m. and p.m. Donors were inseminated with proven semen on Day 14 a.m. and p.m. and Day 15 a.m. Nonsurgical embryo collection was carried out on Day 19 or 20 followed by administration of Lutalyse on Day 25. Following sexual rest for one complete oestrous cycle, Day 5 or 6 SOET was repeated. On Day 9, ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration was used to ablate the DF and the second MOET treatment was initiated at the same time. Mean diameter of DF at the start of superovulation treatment on Day 9 was similar between the first (12.5 ± 0.66 mm) and second (12.2 ± 0.33 mm) MOET cycles. At AI, mean number (9.6 ± 1.43 vs 13.4 ± 1.87) of follicles >9 mm were higher (P < 0.05) in the second (ablation) MOET cycle, though their mean diameters were similar (11.7 ± 0.21 vs 12.3 ± 0.21 mm; P = 0.17). On the day of ova/embryo collection, almost similar numbers of large follicles (4.1 ± 0.93 and 4.4 ± 0.84), with mean diameters of 12.9 ± 0.74 and 13.4 ± 0.83 mm, were observed for the first and second MOET, respectively. Mean (± SEM) numbers of corpora lutea (3.9 ± 0.81 and 4.9 ± 0.61; P = 0.19) and transferable quality embryos (0.6 ± 0.37 and 1.6 ± 0.37; P = 0.077) were counted in the first and second (ablation) MOET cycles, respectively. These preliminary findings suggest that ablation of DF before start of superovulatory treatment may be beneficial in improving the yield of transferable embryos in a buffalo MOET program. Director, CIRB, is acknowledged for the experimental facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207