Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 37 year old man presented with a sensation of weakness, irritability, and poor concentration. His blood glucose was 2.4 mmol/L (reference range 3.6-11; 1 mmol/L=18.02 mg/dL). Three months earlier he had noticed a craving for sweets and episodes of weakness, sometimes associated with foggy sensorium. He felt cold, clammy, and fatigued during these episodes and his wife noticed that he acted strangely and had no memory for long periods. After drinking large amounts of cola he felt better and had gained 30 lb (13 kg) in weight during this time. His symptoms recurred when he had not eaten for several hours, particularly at night and in the early morning. Several days before his current presentation, he had presented to another hospital with similar symptoms and was found to have a blood glucose of 2.6 mmol/L. He responded well to dextrose infusion and was discharged home. His medical history was unremarkable except for an umbilical hernia repair and back surgery 10 years earlier. He was taking no prescription or over the counter drugs. He did not smoke and drank beer socially. He denied taking illicit drugs. His family history was positive for diabetes but he had not been diagnosed as having diabetes. On arrival his blood pressure was 124/76 mm Hg, pulse was 94 beats/min, and respiratory rate was 18 breaths/min. He was confused, cold, and clammy. Examination of the rest of the neurological system; skin; joints; and cardiovascular, respiratory, and abdominal systems was unremarkable. His haemoglobin, white blood cell count, and platelet count were in the normal range. Sodium, potassium, urea, creatinine, and liver panel results were normal. Glycated haemoglobin was 5% (31 mmol/mol). He responded to …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".