c‐Myc creates an activation loop by transcriptionally repressing its own functional inhibitor, hMad4, in young fibroblasts, a loop lost in replicatively senescent fibroblasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
c-Myc transcriptional activity in cells is dampened by the Mad family of transcriptional repressors. The expression of one member, hMad4, is increased in growth-arrested states such as quiescence or replicative senescence; hMad4 mRNA levels in replicatively senescent fibroblasts are about twice those seen in their young contact-inhibited quiescent counterparts. Moreover, the repression of hMad4 transcription following serum stimulation observed in quiescent young fibroblasts is lost in senescent cells. This loss results in persistent expression of hMad4, which leads to an inability to switch from an hMad4/Max complex to a c-Myc/Max complex on selected c-Myc target genes following serum stimulation. We have located an initiator element (Inr), a candidate for Miz-1 binding, in the hMad4 promoter. In reporter assays, Miz-1 enhances reporter GFP expression; this enhancement is inhibited by co-expressing c-Myc. Thus hMad4, as does its murine counterpart, contains the Inr element through which Miz-1 activates its expression; but this action is inhibited in the presence of c-Myc. This inhibition may explain the down-regulation of hMad4, corresponding to the up-regulation of c-Myc, in young serum-starved quiescent fibroblasts upon serum stimulation. However, this reciprocal change does not occur in replicatively senescent fibroblasts upon serum stimulation; instead, hMad4 persists in the presence of high levels of c-Myc activation. Our results suggest that: (1) replicative senescence-specific factors may block c-Myc inhibition of Miz-1 activation of hMad4 expression; and (2) the continual presence of hMad4 protein may transcriptionally repress selected c-Myc target genes, whose functions are key to the signaling pathways leading to apoptosis inhibition and permanent exit of cell cycle traverse in normal human fibroblasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".