Risk of Mosaicism and Uniparental Disomy Associated with the Prenatal Diagnosis of a Non-Homologous Robertsonian Translocation Carrier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the fetal risk of uniparental disomy (UPD) associated with the presence of a Robertsonian translocation (RT) in a parent or in the fetus, to determine whether it is clinically indicated to test these pregnancies for UPD. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of our Centre's experience in testing prenatal specimens for UPD in cases of known familial RTs or fortuitous RT finding. In addition, all reports dealing with prenatal UPD testing in similar populations obtained from PUBMED and the 1995-2001 American Society of Human Genetics Meeting's abstracts were assessed. RESULTS: No case of UPD 14 or 15 was found among the 51 tests performed at our Centre. Meta-analysis identified one case of UPD13 out of 687 UPD studies, conducted in 400 prenatal diagnoses. The 95% confidence interval of the risk of UPD in the population studied (1 in 738) is 0.02-0.76%. In one report, trisomy mosaicism for one of the chromosomes involved in the translocation was found in 3 cases out of 169 (95% confidence interval: 0.1-3 %). CONCLUSIONS: Fetuses carrying a Robertsonian translocation have a risk of UPD of 0.02-0.76% (95% CI). In this population, trisomy mosaicism is more frequent than UPD. This finding justifies the study of additional colonies in all cases of prenatally diagnosed RT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".