Time of feeding and growth promotant effects on the winter growth performance and carcass traits of steers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of time of day of feeding and estrogenic growth promotant on growth performance and carcass traits were determined in three experiments conducted over 3 yr (winters 1998–1999, 1999–2000, 2000–2001). Crossbred steers (year 1, n = 144, year 2, n = 128, year 3, n = 144) were assigned at fall weaning on the basis of sire, age (190 ± 21 d, mean ± SD), and body weight (244 ± 34 kg) to one of eight pens in an outdoor lot at the Brandon Research Centre (49°54′N). In years 1 and 2, pens were assigned to either morning-fed (MF, 0900) or evening-fed (EF, 2000) treatments, and steers within pen were assigned to either Synovex Plus® (TAE) or Synovex S® (PE) growth promotants. In year 3, pens were assigned to either TAE or PE treatments and all were evening-fed. Beginning on Nov. 09 (0 d), steers were given a 20% hay, 80% concentrate (79.2% barley, 0.8% premix) mixed ration (88.6% dry matter, 13.7 MJ kg -1 digestible energy, 124 g kg -1 crude protein, 33.6 mg kg -1 lasalocid). Diets were fed, once daily, in amounts that were consumed before the next feeding, until steers were marketed. Growth promotants were administered at 0 and 84 d. The winter of year 2 was warmer (P < 0.05) than, and years 1 and 3 similar (P > 0.05) to, the 30-yr average ambient temperature (-8.8°C and -12.9°C, respectively). Evening feeding increased (P < 0.05) gain in body weight, especially in year 2 and backfat, especially in year 1, and this was reflected in heavier (P < 0.05) carcass weight in year 2, and whiter (P < 0.05) fat and greater (P < 0.05) rib eye moisture in year 1 and overall reduced (P < 0.05) feed cost of gain in winter. In all 3 yr TAE, relative to PE, produced greater (P < 0.05) body weight gain, and heavier, leaner carcasses with greater (P < 0.05) rib eye area, coarser (P < 0.05) meat texture and greater (P < 0.05) shear force, and reduced (P < 0.05) the feed cost of gain. Time of feeding and choice of growth promotant have significant potential to reduce the business risk of feeding steers in winter. Key words: Beef steer, growth implant, feeding strategy, growth promotant, carcass trait
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".