MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006757841 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.39.4.1059

FENCOOPERITE, Ba6Fe3+3Si8O23(CO3)2Cl3{middle dot}H2O, A NEW MINERAL SPECIES FROM TRUMBULL PEAK, MARIPOSA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

2001· article· en· W2006757841 on OpenAlexaffvenue
A. C. Roberts, J. D. Grice, G. E. Dunning, K. E. Venance

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of NatureGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fencooperite, a new mineral species having the ideal formula Ba 6 Fe 3+ 3 Si 8 O 23 (CO 3 ) 2 Cl 3 ·H 2 O, is trigonal, P 3 m 1, with unit-cell parameters refined from powder data: a 10.727(5), c 7.085(3) A, V 706.1(5) A 3 , c / a 0.6605, Z = 1. The strongest seven lines of the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern [ d in A ( I )( hkl )] are: 3.892(100)(201), 3.148(40)(211), 2.820(90)(202), 2.685(80)(220), 2.208(40)(401), 2.136(40)(222) and 1.705(35)(421). The mineral occurs as a dominant phase within black aggregates 2 mm across in barium-silicate-rich lenses at Trumbull Peak, Mariposa County, California. It is a primary phase, formed after barite, in an aggregate assemblage that includes alforsite, barite, celsian, gillespite, quartz, pyrrhotite and sanbornite. Additional minerals found within the lenses are anandite, benitoite, bigcreekite, fresnoite, kinoshitalite, krauskopfite, macdonaldite, pellyite, titantaramellite, walstromite, witherite, biotite, diopside, fluorapatite, pentlandite, schorl, vesuvianite and three undefined species. Individual grains of fencooperite are anhedral to somewhat rounded to occasionally platy, are jet black to a dirty grey-brown (on very thin edges), do not exceed 100 μm in size, and have an uneven to subconchoidal fracture. Neither morphological forms nor twinning were observed. The streak is greyish black, tenacity is brittle, luster is vitreous to adamantine, and diaphaneity, opaque to translucent (on thin edges). There is no obvious cleavage; D (calc.) 4.338 (for the ideal formula), 4.212 g/cm 3 (for the empirical formula). It is nonfluorescent in ultraviolet light; H (VHN load 10 g) 269 to 367, H (Mohs) 4.5 to 5. Fencooperite is uniaxial negative, O 1.723(4), E 1.711(2), very strongly pleochroic from blue-black ( O ) to light greenish grey ( E ); absorption O ≫ E . Averaged results of electron-microprobe analyses yield BaO 50.51, Fe 2 O 3 12.77, MnO 0.15, SiO 2 27.38, Al 2 O 3 1.35, P 2 O 5 0.16, Cl 3.23, CO 2 [4.81], H 2 O [0.98], sum 101.34, less O = Cl −0.73, total [100.61] wt.%. The empirical formula, derived from results of the crystal-structure analysis and electron-microprobe analyses, is Ba 5.89 (Fe 3+ 2.86 Mn 2+ 0.04 ) ∑2.90 (Si 8.14 Al 0.47 P 0.04 ) ∑8.65 O 23.18 (CO 3 ) 1.95 (Cl 1.63 O 1.37 ) ∑3.00 ·0.97 H 2 O, on the basis of O + Cl = 33. The infrared-absorption spectrum shows bands for carbonate and possibly for structural H 2 O. The mineral name honors Joseph Fenimore Cooper, Jr., Santa Cruz, California, in recognition of his substantive contributions to both mineralogy and mineral collecting in the western United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207