MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006861419 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.08.218

P4–385: Cognitive changes following oophorectomy

2013· article· en· W2006861419 on OpenAlexaff
April Au, Deborah Schwartz, Amy Finch, Mary C. Tierney, Elizabeth Hampson, Steven A. Narod, Gillian Einstein

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreWestern UniversitySunnybrook Health Science CentreWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOophorectomyMedicineEstrogenCognitive declineMenopauseGynecologyInternal medicinePsychologyHysterectomyDiseaseSurgeryDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epidemiological evidence indicating oophorectomy prior to natural menopause is associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's Disease (Rocca et al., 2007) and parkinsonism (Rocca et al., 2008) suggests that estrogen deprivation is implicated in cognitive decline. However, the trajectory of cognitive changes following oophorectomy is poorly understood beyond six months post-surgically (Sherwin, 1988). The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term effects of estrogen deprivation induced by oophorectomy on cognitive functioning, up to ten years post-surgically. The experimental group comprised of female carriers of the BRCA1/2 mutation who had undergone a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO; removal of fallopian tubes and ovaries) between one to seven years ago as prophylaxis against the risk of gynaecological cancers. An age-matched control group of healthy women and a BRCA control group comprised of women with a BRCA mutation prior to oophorectomy were also recruited. All women were tested once a year, for three years using a battery of neuropsychological tests assessing spatial and verbal memory, working memory, as well as executive functioning. Urine and saliva samples were taken respectively to determine estrogen levels at the time of testing and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype. It was hypothesized that women who have undergone BSO would score lower on measures of verbal memory. Carriers of the APOE E4 allele who had undergone BSO were hypothesized to perform the worst as the E4 allele is associated with an increased vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease. Results indicate that women with BSO performed significantly worse than age-matched controls on the immediate and delayed recall of the Logical Memory task of the Wechsler Memory Scale. Years since oophorectomy was also negatively correlated to the score on the delayed recall of the RAVLT after controlling for age. Preliminary results suggest that premature estrogen deprivation is associated with a decrement in verbal memory compared to women matched in age and education. Importantly, time since BSO appears to exacerbate the decline of verbal memory independent of age. Results corroborate previous research showing cognitive decline post-BSO, but also suggests that verbal memory declines as a function of time since estrogen deprivation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesFrench-language works237,207