Multiple equilibria of the <i>Escherichia coli</i> chaperonin GroES revealed by mass spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nanospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry has been used to study the assembly of the heptamer of the Escherichia coli cochaperonin protein GroES, a system previously described as a monomer-heptamer equilibrium. In addition to the monomers and heptamers, we have found measurable amounts of dimers and hexamers, the presence of which suggests the following mechanism for heptamer assembly: 2 Monomers <--> Dimer; 3 Dimers <--> Hexamer; Hexamer + Monomer <--> Heptamer. Equilibrium constants for each of these steps, and an overall constant for the Monomer <--> Heptamer equilibrium, have been estimated from the data. These constants imply a standard free-energy change, DeltaG(0), of about 9 kcal/mol for each contact surface formed between GroES subunits, except for the addition of the last subunit, where DeltaG(0) = 6 kcal/mol. This lower value probably reflects the loss of entropy when the heptamer ring is formed. These experiments illustrate the advantages of electrospray mass spectrometry as a method of measuring all components of a multiple equilibrium system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".