MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006954519 · doi:10.1021/es0105156

Vacuum Method for Carbonation of Cementitious Wasteforms

2001· article· en· W2006954519 on OpenAlexaff
Michael A. Venhuis, Eric J. Reardon

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbonationMaterials scienceCementitiousCementCarbonateSupercritical fluidWaste managementChemical engineeringMineralogyComposite materialMetallurgyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The application of carbonation treatment to cement-based wasteforms as a means to reduce the leachability of entrained undesirable substances, both radioactive and nonradioactive, has been the subject of much study over the past decade. Upon carbonation, hydrated cement phases release their water of hydration and are converted into carbonate minerals. The carbonation process has been shown to reduce the pore size distribution and permeability of the cementitious materials since portions of the original pore network become sites for precipitation of secondary carbonate minerals. As a result, the leachability of entrained contaminants can be markedly reduced. Current methods to carbonate cement-based wasteforms after they have cured rely on exposure to high pressure or supercritical CO2 pressures. In this study, a new low-pressure technique is presented. The method provides more complete carbonation than high-pressure techniques. The principle is to remove the water of reaction as it is produced, thereby maintaining an open pore network to facilitate the transfer of CO2 into the specimen. This is accomplished by conducting the reaction at near-vaccum pressures in the presence of a desiccant. The near-vacuum conditions lower the impedance of water transport from the carbonating specimen to the desiccant due to the large mean free path of the water vapor molecules. The technique was applied to a series of wasteform samples with entrained cationic and anionic waste components. Carbonation penetration depths of up to 11 mm were attained within 45 h of reaction for cylindrical wasteform samples prepared with OPC at a water/cement ratio of 0.60. A carbonation penetration depth of 15 mm was attained in a 6 d reaction of blended cement (OPC and 30% Class 'F' fly ash). In standardized leach tests, cationic waste constituents showed lower leachabilities from carbonated samples than from uncarbonated samples. Anionic waste constituents, however, showed greater leachabilities, and anion leachability increased with the degree of carbonation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207