[NO][HCB<sub>11</sub>Cl<sub>11</sub>] – Synthesis, Characterization, Crystal Structure, and Reaction with P<sub>4</sub>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The thermodynamic stability of the [HCB 11 Cl 11 ] – salts of the cationic one‐electron oxidizers [NO] + and [O 2 ] + was estimated by Born–Haber–Fajans cycles based on quantum‐chemical calculations and lattice enthalpy estimations. [NO][HCB 11 Cl 11 ] is predicted to be a stable compound, whereas [O 2 ][HCB 11 Cl 11 ] should decompose into O 2 and the HCB 11 Cl 11 · radical. Consequently, [NO][HCB 11 Cl 11 ] can be prepared by metathesis reaction from Na[HCB 11 Cl 11 ] and [NO][BF 4 ] in liquid sulfur dioxide, while attempts to synthesize [O 2 ][HCB 11 Cl 11 ] failed. [NO][HCB 11 Cl 11 ] has been fully characterized by NMR and vibrational spectroscopy. Single crystals of [NO][HCB 11 Cl 11 ] · SO 2 were obtained from liquid sulfur dioxide solution. The crystal structure determination revealed several intermolecular cation–anion contacts, which are significantly shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of the respective atoms. [NO][HCB 11 Cl 11 ] reacts with white phosphorus in CH 2 Cl 2 solution to give yellow‐orange [P 4 NO][HCB 11 Cl 11 ] containing the [P 4 NO] + cation. An in‐situ NMR spectroscopic study indicates the presence of the homopolyatomic phosphorus cation [P 9 ] + in the reaction mixture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it