Sequential Synthesis of Type II Colloidal CdTe/CdSe Core–Shell Nanocrystals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colloidal type II CdTe/CdSe nanocrystals were synthesized by sequential addition of a tri-n-octylphosphine telluride (TOPTe)/TOP solution and several shell-precursor solutions to a CdO/TOP solution; the shell-precursor solutions consisted of CdO and TOPSe in TOP. For the growth of the CdTe core, the TOPTe/TOP solution was swiftly added to the CdO/TOP solution at a higher temperature (300 degrees C) than the growth temperature (250 degrees C). For the growth of the CdSe shell, in contrast, the CdO/TOPSe/TOP solution was slowly added to the CdTe/TOP solution at a lower temperature than the growth temperature (200-240 degrees C). The temporal evolution of the optical properties of the growing core-shell nanocrystals was monitored in detail. During the growth of the CdSe shell, the core-shell nanocrystals exhibited interesting changes in photoluminescence (PL) properties. The highest PL efficiency (approximately 38 %) was detected from core-shell nanocrystals with a CdSe shell thickness of 0.4-0.5 nm (indicated by TEM); the formation of the first monolayer is proposed. Our synthetic approach is well suited to a practical realization of engineering materials with bandgaps in the near-IR and IR spectral ranges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it