Flow and Solute Transport in Saturated Porous Media: 1. The Continuum Hypothesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The continuum hypothesis provides one alternative to dealing with transport phenomena in porous media. If adapted correctly, the continuum approach may be easier than dealing with the system at the microscopic level. However, to adopt the continuum approach to phenomena occurring in porous media, certain conditions and length scale constraints need to be satisfied. Failing to satisfy these conditions may restrict the use of this approach, and other sophisticated methods need to be devised. This article provides an overview of the conditions and length scale constraints needed to be able to adopt the continuum hypothesis. Two types of length scale constraints may be identified. The first type arises when establishing the conditions and requirements for proper upscaling; they are thus essential and hence have to be completely satisfied. They have been collected in four constraints. The second type represents those derived during mathematical manipulations and order of magnitude analysis to neglect higher-order terms. It will be shown that most of the second type of length scale constraints are automatically satisfied once the essential constraints are satisfied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".