MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006997768 · doi:10.1115/imece2003-43718

Application of Predictive Control for Autonomous Satellite Capture Using a Deployable Manipulator System

2003· article· en· W2006997768 on OpenAlexafffund
Richard McCourt, Clarence W. de Silva

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsModel predictive controlController (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)RobotComputer scienceRoboticsControl engineeringTorqueTask (project management)SimulationArtificial intelligenceEngineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two prototypes of a robot known as the Multi-module Deployable Manipulator System (MDMS) have been developed in our laboratory. This manipulator is intended for carrying for research in space platform-based robotics. In the present paper, this manipulator is used in laboratory-simulated capture of an orbiting satellite. A model-based predictive controller is developed and implemented in the MDMS. Using the controlled manipulator, laboratory experiments are carried out to study autonomous capture of a free floating and spinning target. The objective is to evaluate the performance of the predictive controller for the capturing task. A planar prototype MDMS is used as the chaser robot in experiments, and the target statellite is simulated within the controller. The model of the target statelite assumes that it is free of any external torques and involves rotations within the plane of operation of the MDMS prototype. The predictions for the chaser robot are based on a model of the MDMS, linearized about the starting configuration of the task. An unconstrained predictive controller is used in the present experiments. The resluts from tracking various moving target are presented, with and without predictions of the target movement. The performance is shown to be quite satisfactory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207