Isolation, characterizaton, and inheritance of microsatellite loci in alpine larch and western larch
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microsatellite loci or simple sequence repeat loci (SSRs) were isolated in alpine larch (Larix lyallii Parl.) and western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.). In total, 14 SSR loci were characterized; two [(TCT)4, A7] came from published Larix DNA sequence data, one (CA)17 was obtained from a partial non-enriched alpine larch total genomic DNA library, and the remaining 11 loci were obtained from larch genomic DNAs enriched for (CA)n repeats. The SSR regions in these clones could be divided into three categories: perfect repeat sequences without interruption, imperfect repeat sequences with interruption(s), and compound repeat sequences with adjacent tandem simple dinucleotides. Eight of the 14 loci analyzed were found to be polymorphic and useful markers after silver-staining polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In addition, several SSR primers developed for alpine larch were able to successfully amplify polymorphic loci in its related species, western larch, and among other closely related taxa within the Larix genus. The inheritance of microsatellite loci was verified by analysis of haploid megagametophyte and diploid embryo tissues of progeny obtained from controlled crosses between western larch and alpine larch. All microsatellite loci analyzed had alleles that segregated according to expected Mendelian frequencies. Two species-specific markers (UAKLly10a and UAKLla1) allow easy and rapid identification of specific genetic entry of alpine larch and western larch at any stage in the sporophyte phase of the life cycle. Therefore, these markers are efficient in identifying the parental species and to validate controlled crosses between these two closely related species. These results are important in tree improvement programs of alpine larch and western larch aimed at producing genetically improved hybrid stock for reforestation in Western Canada and U.S.A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".