Electrochemistry and Homogeneous Self-Exchange Kinetics of the Aqueous 12-Tungstoaluminate(5−/6−) Couple
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of alkali metal (M) chloride or triflate supporting electrolytes (0.1-1.0 mol L(-1)) on the midpoint potential E(m) of the aqueous AlW12O40(5-/6-) couple in cyclic voltammetry, after correction (E(corr)) for liquid junction potentials, can be represented in terms of ionic strength according to the extended Debye-Hückel equation. However, unrealistically short AlW12O40(5-/6-)-cation closest-approach distances are required to accommodate the specific effects of M+, and the infinite-dilution potential E(corr)(0) values are not quite consistent from one M+ to another. The pressure dependence of Em is qualitatively consistent with expectations based on the Born-Drude-Nernst theory. The strong accelerating effects of supporting electrolytes on the standard electrode reaction rate constant k(el) at pH 3 as measured by alternating current voltammetry (ACV), and on the homogeneous self-exchange rate constant k(ex) at pH 3-7 as measured by 27Al line broadening, depend specifically on the identity and concentration of M+ (Li+ < Na+ < K+ < Rb+) rather than on the ionic strength, whereas the effect of the nature of the supporting anion (Cl- or CF3SO3-) is negligible. Extrapolation of k(el) and k(ex) to zero [M+] indicates that the uncatalyzed electron transfer rate is negligibly small relative to the M+ catalyzed rates. The kinetic effects of M+ show no evidence of the saturation expected had they been due primarily to ion pairing with AlW12O40(5-/6-). The catalytic effect of M+ operates primarily through lowering the enthalpy of activation, which is partially offset by a strongly negative entropy of activation and, for the homogeneous exchange catalyzed by K+ or Rb+, becomes mildly negative; thus, the catalytic effect of M(+) is enthalpy-driven but entropy-limited. For the electrode reaction, the volume of activation averages +4.5 +/- 0.2 cm(3) mol(-1) for all M+ and [M+], in contrast to the negative value predicted theoretically for the uncatalyzed reaction. These results are consistent with a reaction mechanism, previously proposed for other anion-anion electron-transfer reactions, in which anion-anion electron transfer is facilitated by partially dehydrated M+.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".