MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007116845 · doi:10.4141/p99-097

Effect of spermine and cyclohexylamine on in vitro pollen germination and tube growth in <i>Helianthus annuus</i>

2000· article· en· W2007116845 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
E. T. ÇETIN, Cansev Yildirim, Narçın Palavan-Ünsal, Meral ÜNAL

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPollen tubeGerminationPollenSpermineHelianthus annuusCyclohexylamineBiologyElongationSunflowerBotanyHorticultureChemistryBiochemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Naturally occurring polyamines (PA) are known to play a key role in growth and development of plants and animals. However, the role of these polycations in the development and germination of the pollen grain is not well understood. The effect of different concentrations of spermine (Spm) on pollen tube growth in Helianthus annuus was investigated. Spermine treatments in the 10 −7 to 10 −5 M range stimulated pollen tube growth starting in the first 15 min of the incubation period, while 10 −4 M Spm treatment resulted in inhibition of pollen tube elongation. The effect of cyclohexylamine (CHA), an inhibitor of Spm synthesis on pollen tube growth and germination percentage was also studied. Cyclohexylamine in the 0.5 × 10 −3 M to the 1.5 × 10 −3 M range inhibited pollen tube elongation. The relationship of B deficiency, excess B and PA effect on pollen germination and pollen tube growth were also investigated. Key words: Polyamines, pollen, cyclohexylamine, boron

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207