Cyclic 1,3-Dipoles or Acyclic Phosphonium Ylides? Electronic Characterization of “Montréalones”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structural features of a recently introduced class of 1,3-dipolar reagents have been computed by density functional theory and ab initio methods. The reagents are formally derived from Münchnones by replacement of the C O group with a PR3 unit. The parent species (PR3 = PH3) shows a long P...O interaction (2.55 A at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d) level), together with a nonplanar ring, and is best described as a weakly chelated acylamino-phosphonium ylide. The corresponding acyclic form, in which the P...O interaction is absent, is predicted to be 2-3 kcal mol-1 higher in enthalpy. Variation of the phosphorus substituents exerts a marked effect on the P...O distance, with electron-withdrawing groups favoring a covalent interaction [P...O 1.97 A for PR3 = PPh(catechyl)] and electron-donating groups favoring a weak interaction [P...O 3.92 A for PR3 = PPh3]. However, this variation has little effect on the relative energies of the cyclic and acyclic forms. The barriers for concerted cycloadditions with ethylene are 22.8 kcal mol-1 (PH3), 31.7 kcal mol-1 (PPh3), and 16.2 kcal mol-1 [PPh(catechyl) with axial O], which correspond with experimental observations and follow the same trend as the energies required to distort the dipole to the TS geometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".