MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007163045 · doi:10.2118/0310-0063-jpt

Novel Thermal Technology Uses Two-Wellhead Wells

2010· article· en· W2007163045 on OpenAlex
Karen Bybee

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWellheadSteam injectionPetroleum engineeringOil shaleSteam-assisted gravity drainageOil sandsGeologyAsphaltEnvironmental scienceEngineeringWaste managementMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article, written by Assistant Technology Editor Karen Bybee, contains highlights of paper SPE 120413, ’A Novel Thermal Technology of Formation Treatment Involves Bi-Wellhead Horizontal Wells,’ by R.R. Ibatullin, SPE, N.G. Ibragimov, SPE, R.S. Khisamov, A.T. Zaripov, and M.I. Amerkhanov, Tatneft, originally prepared for the 2009 SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Bahrain, 15-18 March. The Republic of Tatarstan possesses significant reserves of heavy oil and bitumen. The first pilot project on heavy-oil production through vertical wells dates back to the 1970s. A number of thermal methods were tested including in-situ combustion, cyclic-steam stimulation, and gas/steam-mixture injection. However, all these methods demonstrated their insufficiency. In 2006, a new pilot project was launched. This is a modified technology of steam stimulation through a pair of U-shaped horizontal wells. Introduction There are many applications of the steam-assisted gravity-drainage (SAGD) method in Alberta, Canada. The efficiency of the SAGD method greatly depends on the presence of water-saturated and shale interlayers in the reservoir section. In 2006, a new pilot project was launched in Ashalchinskoye field to test a modified low-pressure SAGD technology using a unique pair of U-shaped horizontal wells (two-wellhead wells) (Fig. 1). This technique overcomes some disadvantages of classic SAGD technology. This deposit occurs at approximately 78 m and has a rather complex structure. Water-saturated interlayers are found in the top and in highly oil-saturated zones of the formation, while shale stringers are found in the middle of the sequence. Both aquifers and tight, low-permeability, calcareous sandstones or a low-saturated reservoir can serve as the bottom of the formation. New Solutions To date, three pairs of U-shaped horizontal wells have been drilled in this area, with the length of horizontal wellbores from 200 to 400 m. The wells were drilled with a vertical drilling rig, hitting the surface at an angle, thus having two wellheads–vertical and slanted. Two parallel horizontal wells were completed with sand screens and were drilled one above the other at a vertical distance of 5 m between them. The process monitoring is carried out through vertical evaluation wells, and a fiber-optic cable is used for temperature measurement along the horizontal wellbore. The wells were completed by swabbing until mud and solids stopped being produced; then, steam was injected into both wells with the subsequent placing of the lower well on pump production; temperature was monitored along the wellbore length to determine lost-circulation zones and to control the profile of the wellbore heating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it