Linear Regression Based Acoustic Adaptation for the Subspace Gaussian Mixture Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a study of two acoustic speaker adaptation techniques applied in the context of the subspace Gaussian mixture model (SGMM) for automatic speech recognition (ASR). First, a model space linear regression based approach is presented for adaptation of SGMM state projection vectors and is referred to as subspace vector adaptation (SVA). Second, an easy to implement realization of constrained maximum likelihood linear regression (CMLLR) is presented for feature space adaptation in the SGMM. Numerically stable procedures for row-by-row estimation of the regression based transformation matrices are presented for both SVA and CMLLR adaptation. These approaches are applied to SGMM models that are estimated using speaker adaptive training (SAT), a technique for estimating more compact speaker independent acoustic models. Unsupervised speaker adaptation performance is evaluated on conversational and read speech task domains and compared to unsupervised adaptation performance obtained using the hidden Markov model-Gaussian mixture model (HMM-GMM) in ASR. It is shown that the feature space and model space adaptation approaches applied to the SGMM provide complementary reductions in word error rate (WER) and provide lower WERs than that obtained using CMLLR adaptation for the HMM-GMM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".