Rapid cardiovascular effects of dexamethasone in rabbits with meconium-induced acute lung injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glucocorticoids may improve lung function in newborns with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), but information on the acute side effects of glucocorticoids in infants is limited. In this study using a rabbit model of MAS, we addressed the hypothesis that systemic administration of dexamethasone causes acute cardiovascular changes. Adult rabbits were treated with 2 intravenous doses of dexamethasone (0.5 mg/kg each) or saline at 0.5 h and 2.5 h after intratracheal instillation of human meconium or saline. Animals were oxygen-ventilated for 5 h after the first dose of treatment. Blood pressure, heart rate, and short-term heart rate variability (HRV) were analyzed during treatment, for 5 min immediately after each dose, and for the 5 h of the experiment. In the meconium-instilled animals, dexamethasone increased blood pressure, decreased heart rate, increased HRV parameters, and caused cardiac arrhythmia during and immediately after administration. In the saline-instilled animals, the effect of dexamethasone was inconsistent. In these animals, the acute effects of dexamethasone on blood pressure and cardiac rhythm were reversed after 30 min, whereas heart rate continued to decrease and HRV parameters continued to increase for 5 h after the first dose of dexamethasone. These effects were more pronounced in meconium-instilled animals. If systemic glucocorticoids are used in the treatment of MAS, cardiovascular side effects of glucocorticoids should be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".