Evolving Recovery Technologies Directed Towards Commercial Development of the Grosmont Carbonate Reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Starting in the 1970s, Union Oil Company of Canada (Unocal), in partnership with Canadian Superior and the Alberta Government, conducted a series of exploratory field tests in the bitumen-saturated carbonate rocks of the Grosmont Formation. These tests applied thermal recovery technologies, including steam drive and cyclic steam stimulation (CSS), that were in their early stages of development. Significant amounts of production and observational data were obtained. Although some results were encouraging, activities in Grosmont were eventually stalled in the mid 1980s as economic attention was shifted to Cold Lake and Athabasca Cretaceous siliclastic reservoirs. Since then, in situ bitumen recovery, 3D seismic, horizontal well and surface processing technologies have matured significantly. In light of the enormous resources (406 billion barrels) hosted within the Grosmont Formation, it is pertinent to ask whether those new technologies are applicable for carbonate reservoir development. To answer this question, we studied data from the Unocal pilots conducted in the Grosmont C and augmented it with recent laboratory tests on newly acquired Grosmont C cores. The previous pilot CSS results were encouraging, with the cycle steam-to oil ratio as low as 3.65 and a peak rate of 440 bbls/d from a single vertical well. With subsequent cycles the ratio of the produced fluid to the injected fluid increased, signifying the injected energy was retained and more effective in later cycles. The operation strategy of the Unocal pilots and its implementation were not optimal and we believe that this could be improved with modern techniques. Based on our new understanding of the Grosmont Formation and specifically the Grosmont C, a numerical model was created and verified with production data. Model results indicate that the application of SAGD will be a commercially viable recovery process for Grosmont carbonate reservoirs and that low pressure injection (below 3500kPa) would be desirable. The laboratory tests not only support these conclusions but also suggest that performance of the applicable thermal processes can be enhanced with the addition of solvent. A SAGD/solvent pilot test is planned to start up in late 2010. This pilot will be critical to the development of exploitation strategies applicable to Grosmont carbonate bitumen resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".