Thermal Dissociation of Protein−Oligosaccharide Complexes in the Gas Phase: Mapping the Intrinsic Intermolecular Interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blackbody infrared radiative dissociation (BIRD) and functional group replacement are used to map the location and strength of hydrogen bonds between an antibody single chain fragment (scFv) and its natural trisaccharide receptor, alpha-D-Galp (1-->2)[alpha-D-Abep (1-->3)]alpha-D-Manp1-->OMe (1), in the gaseous, multiply protonated complex. Arrhenius activation parameters (E(a) and A) are reported for the loss of 1 and a series of monodeoxy trisaccharide congeners (5-8 identical with tri) from the (scFv + tri + 10H)(+10) complex. The energetic contribution of the specific oligosaccharide OH groups to the stability of the (scFv + 1 + 10H)(+10) complex is determined from the differences in E(a) measured for the trisaccharide analogues and 1 (55.2 kcal/mol). A decrease of 6 to 11 kcal/mol in E(a), measured for the monodeoxy trisaccharides, indicates that the deleted OH groups interact strongly with the scFv and that they account for a majority of the stabilizing intermolecular interactions. A partial map of the hydrogen bond donor/acceptor groups of 1 and the strength of the interactions is presented for the protonated +10 complex. A comparison of the gas-phase map with the crystal structure indicates that significant structural differences exist. The hydroxyl groups located outside of the binding pocket, and exposed to solvent in solution, participate in new protein-oligosaccharide hydrogen bonds in the gas phase. The decrease in kinetic and energetic stability of the (scFv + 2 + nH)(n)()(+) complex with increasing charge-state is attributed to conformational differences in the binding region induced by electrostatic repulsion. The similarity in the Arrhenius parameters for the +9 and +10 charge states suggests that repulsion effects on the structure of the binding region are negligible below +11.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".