Unemployment and Disability in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GOALS: Unemployment and disability rates in Crohn's disease patients from the ACCENT I trial were assessed. Factors associated with employment and disability status were explored. BACKGROUND: Limited data regarding unemployment and disability status in patients with active Crohn's disease are available. STUDY: Baseline data were used to assess unemployment and disability rates. Logistic regression analysis examined factors that were associated with employment and disability status. Analysis of variance was used to compare quality of life. RESULTS: The baseline full-and part-time employment rates were 48% and 13%, respectively, with 39% of patients unemployed and 25% receiving disability compensation. Only 14% of 225 unemployed patients felt well enough to work if a job were available. Younger age, female gender, shorter disease duration, and prior bowel resection predicted a higher likelihood of unemployment. Younger age and female gender also predicted a higher likelihood of not being employed full-time. Prior bowel resection predicted a higher likelihood of receiving disability compensation. Quality of life (Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, Short Form-36) scores were significantly higher in employed patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease had low employment and high disability rates. Given their economic importance, assessment of these outcomes should be integrated into future evaluations of therapy, including clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".