Response to Daily 10 Mg Alfuzosin Predicts Acute Urinary Retention and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Related Surgery in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: We analyzed the influence of treatment response on the risk of acute urinary retention and benign prostatic hyperplasia related surgery in 5,792 men complaining of lower urinary tract symptoms who were treated for 6 months with the selective alpha1-blocker alfuzosin at 10 mg once daily. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The influence of dynamic variables (International Prostate Symptom Score change and bother during treatment) and baseline variables (patient age, prior acute urinary retention managed conservatively, prostate specific antigen, International Prostate Symptom Score and bother severity) on the risk of acute urinary retention and benign prostatic hyperplasia related surgery was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. The associated HR and 95% CI were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: During alfuzosin treatment International Prostate Symptom Score improved by 3 or greater and greater than 6 points in 74.8% and 50.3% of men, respectively. In this unselected population, including 3.8% with prior unoperated acute urinary retention, the rate of acute urinary retention and benign prostatic hyperplasia related surgery events during treatment was low (0.5% and 1.1%, respectively). Men with stable or worsening International Prostate Symptom Score were at increased risk for acute urinary retention or surgery (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.58 to 8.89, p = 0.003 and HR 4.71, 95% CI 2.69 to 8.24, p <0.001, respectively). Prior acute urinary retention was a strong predictor of acute urinary retention relapse and surgery (HR 10.35, 95% CI 4.29 to 26.08, p <0.001 and HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.59 to 7.98, p = 0.002, respectively). Bother score greater than 3 during treatment was the strongest predictor of surgery (HR 7.61, 95% CI 4.16 to 13.93, p <0.001). Prostate specific antigen had much less predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: This 6-month real life practice study shows that alfuzosin is associated with a low incidence of acute urinary retention and benign prostatic hyperplasia related surgery. It also suggests that responder status is the most important predictor of acute urinary retention and benign prostatic hyperplasia related surgery. Thus, first line treatment with alfuzosin may help select patients at risk for benign prostatic hyperplasia progression to optimize treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".