Intense episodic predation by shorebirds may influence life history strategy of an intertidal amphipod
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Life history theory suggests that selective predation on older or larger individuals in prey populations or a disturbance such as intense and episodic predation should lead to smaller size at maturity, and a tendency toward semelparity. Many populations of the intertidal amphipod, Corophium volutator , in the western Atlantic are subjected to an intense period of size‐selective predation for about one month in summer, during the southward migration of shorebirds. We compared size at maturity and fecundity of populations of C. volutator from mudflats that are intensively used by shorebirds with populations that are visited by very few birds. We found that mature females were of similar size in May, but those from bird mudflats produced more offspring during the first reproductive episode. In July, females of the summer generation began to reproduce at a smaller size on bird mudflats, and as a consequence, produced fewer offspring that grew more slowly. The results of this correlative study suggest that shorebird predation has shaped C. volutator life history in two ways. First, females on bird mudflats concentrate their reproductive effort into a larger early brood, probably because later broods would come to maturity during the period of intense predation. Second, in summer, amphipods begin to reproduce at a smaller size so as to produce a brood before the arrival of the birds in mid‐July. Predators are not present at the time that these responses occur, and thus they are probably not a plastic response to perceived predation risk. Thus the patterns we observed agree with the predictions of recent theories: individuals faced with a predictable disturbance alter their life cycles so as to minimize the effect of that disturbance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".