MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007435809 · doi:10.2118/166135-ms

Universal Fluid Characterization Using an EOS Based on Perturbation from n-Alkanes

2013· article· en· W2007435809 on OpenAlexaff
Ashutosh Kumar, Ryosuke Okuno

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
Keywordsvan der Waals forceThermodynamicsPerturbation (astronomy)Characterization (materials science)Combining rulesEquation of stateStatistical physicsMaterials scienceChemistryMathematicsPhysicsMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Reliability of compositional simulation can depend significantly on the phase behavior model used in the simulation. Characterization of reservoir fluids using a cubic equation of state (EOS) is conducted based on experimental data available. Thermodynamic conditions used in laboratory measurements, however, are only a small part of actual conditions encountered in reservoir processes. Thus, reservoir fluid characterization is performed under unavoidable uncertainties in pressure-temperature-composition (P-T-x) space. The implicit, non-linear relationship between phase behavior predictions and adjustment parameters also makes fluid characterization non-unique and subjective. Although P-T-x space that phase behavior spans is continuous, different characterization methods have been proposed for different types of reservoir fluids. In our previous research, a method was developed for heavy-oil characterization using the Peng-Robinson (PR) EOS with the van der Waals mixing rules without volume shift. Uncertainty issues in heavy-oil characterization were addressed based on the concept of perturbation from n-alkanes (the PnA method). Pseudo components were initially assigned critical parameters that were optimized for n-alkanes in terms of liquid densities and vapor pressures using the PR EOS. The optimized reference values allowed for well-defined directions for perturbation of pseudo components’ critical parameters to match available experimental data. The robust regression algorithm required only three perturbation parameters. In this paper, we extend the PnA method to lighter fluids, such as gas condensates, volatile oils, and near-critical fluids. The main novelty of the new PnA method is that it considers proper interrelationship (ψ = a/b2) between the attraction (a) and covolume (b) parameters of pseudo components. The regression algorithm developed in this research controls the trend of the ψ parameter with respect to molecular weight using a fourth adjustment parameter γ. The ψ and γ parameters become more important for characterizing lighter fluids. For extra heavy oils, the new PnA method naturally reduces to the previous PnA method, where γ is zero. Case studies using 77 different reservoir fluids demonstrate the universal applicability, reliability, robustness, and efficiency of the new PnA method. The fluids used consist of 34 heavy and black oils, 12 volatile oils, and 31 gas condensates. Six fluids are near critical among them. The PnA method controls phase behavior predictions monotonically with parameter adjustments and systematically in P-T-x space. This is demonstrated by quantitative prediction of condensation/vaporization behavior of gas condensates and light oils and minimum miscibility pressures for various oil displacements. The PnA method requires no change in the thermodynamic model used; i.e., it can be readily implemented in existing software based on the PR EOS with the van der Waals mixing rules. We also explain how volume-shift parameters affect compositional phase behavior predictions when used as regression parameters in fluid characterization. The PnA method uses no volume shift, and properly couples volumetric and compositional phase behaviors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207