MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detecting trophic‐level variation in consumer assemblages

2008· article· en· W2007461910 on OpenAlexafffund
Blake Matthews, Asit Mazumder

Bibliographic record

VenueFreshwater Biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTrophic levelCladoceraZooplanktonDaphniaDetritusEcologyBiologyTrophic cascadeBranchiopodaδ15NTrophic state indexStable isotope ratioFood webδ13CEutrophicationNutrient

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary 1. Stable isotopes of nitrogen are useful for quantifying the trophic structure of food webs, but only if the variation in trophic enrichment (Δ N ), which is the difference in δ 15 N between a consumer and its food, is small relative to the value of Δ N itself. 2. We examined the sources of variation in zooplankton Δ N by measuring the trophic enrichment (Δ N ) of seven species of freshwater cladocerans, and by testing for an effect of age and temperature on the Δ N of Daphnia pulicaria . 3. We found that Δ N was similar among Cladocera and was not correlated with body size. Overall, the Δ N for D. pulicaria was 1.4‰ (SE = 0.69, n = 57), as was expected for the detritus diet that we used in our experiments. We found no effect of temperature (15–25 °C) on Δ N , but found that Δ N of D. pulicaria increased with increasing age (10–30 days). 4. We developed a new method to test for trophic‐level variation in a group of consumers that explicitly accounts for the uncertainty in Δ N . Using this approach, we confirmed that natural assemblages of zooplankton feed at several trophic levels in lake food webs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFreshwater BiologySame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207