MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007477253 · doi:10.1093/europace/euq161

Evaluation of non-synonymous NPPA single nucleotide polymorphisms in atrial fibrillation

2010· article· en· W2007477253 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Joan Roberts, R. W. Davies, Steven A. Lubitz, Isabelle Thibodeau, Pablo B. Nery, David H. Birnie, Emelia J. Benjamin, Robert Lemery, Patrick T. Ellinor, Michael H. Gollob

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioSingle-nucleotide polymorphismInternal medicineAtrial fibrillationCardiologyConfidence intervalPolymorphism (computer science)SNPGeneticsGenotypeGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. A genetic mutation in the NPPA gene, which encodes the atrial natriuretic peptide, has been identified as the putative causative factor in a family with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance for AF. Two common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in NPPA, rs5063 and rs5065, result in amino acid changes of the primary peptide and have been previously implicated in conditions associated with AF, including stroke and hypertension. Recently, the rs5063 SNP has been reported to confer an increased risk of AF development in a Chinese population. We sought to examine the associations of both rs5063 and rs5065 with AF in two separate North American cohorts of European ancestry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with early-onset AF, along with healthy controls, were recruited at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute (UOHI) and the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Study participants were genotyped for rs5063 and rs5065 using a combination of restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and DNA microarrays. The study genotyped a total of 620 AF cases and 2446 healthy controls. The UOHI arm of the study identified an odds ratio (OR) of 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-1.24] for rs5063, whereas an OR of 1.33 (95% CI: 0.80-2.21) was observed in the MGH arm. The combined OR approximated unity (OR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.54-1.80). Analysis of rs5065 revealed an OR of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.84-1.48) in UOHI, 1.08 (95% CI 0.80-1.45) in MGH, and 1.10 (95% CI 0.90-1.35) when combined. CONCLUSION: Common non-synonymous genetic variants within NPPA in these two large North American cohorts of European ancestry are not associated with the development of AF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207