Autoantibodies to novel cytoplasmic structures (GW bodies) involved in mRNA processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This particular cytoplasmic discrete speckled pattern (1,2) is quite unique as the structures observed are a new entity named GW bodies (Figure 1), abbreviated GWBs (also known as mammalian P bodies or processing bodies). Functionally, GWBs are involved in the process of RNA interference (RNAi), mRNA degradation and/or mRNA storage. A subset of mRNAs are targeted to these cytoplasmic structures, therefore GWBs play a central role in the cell by influencing the fate of mRNAs. GWBs are ubiquitous and present in many tissues and cell lines as well as normal cells but appear to be more highly expressed in cancer cells such as HEp-2 (laryngeal carcinoma) and HeLa (cervical carcinoma) that are now routinely used to screen human sera for the presence of autoantibodies. To date, five target autoantigens in GWBs have been published. They include GW182, a unique protein characterized by a numerous glycine (G) and tryptophan (W) repeats(3), Ge-1/hedls (4,5), RAP-55(6), diacyl-phosphatidyl ethanolamine(2), and Su/hAgo2(7). The clinical diagnosis of patients with autoantibodies to GWBs can be divided into four main groups. In a study from the University of Calgary, the most common diagnosis is Sjogren’s syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and the third group has neurological disease(3). In another study from Brazil(2) there was no clear cut clinical associations, although 3 patients with SLE were noted, but the majority comprise the fourth category of other conditions(2). The difference between the clinical profiles in these two centers may be explained on the basis of different clinical referral patterns. For example, in Calgary, serum samples of patients with suspected autoimmune neurological disease (ataxia, motor and sensory neuropathy) are routinely evaluated. Examination of 5000 patient serum samples received during 2000-2001, by ANA at the Mitogen Advanced Diagnostics Laboratory at the University of Calgary, demonstrated that the prevalence Figura 1 – Hep2000 cells stained with patient serum containing autoantibodies to GWBs (red). The nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). Arrows are pointing to different sized GWBs while the arrowhead marks a cell undergoing mitosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".