Characterization of the In Vivo and In Vitro Electrophysiological Effects of the Novel Antiarrhythmic Agent AZD7009 in Atrial and Ventricular Tissue of the Dog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of the novel antiarrhythmic agent AZD7009 on atrial and ventricular repolarization and on the Na+-current system, using Vmax as an index. Anesthetized dogs were infused with AZD7009 or azimilide to produce three pseudo steady-state plasma concentrations in vivo. Microelectrode techniques were used to record action potentials and effective refractory period (ERP) in vitro. Whereas AZD7009 concentration-dependently increased atrial ERP (AERP, by 48 +/- 7 milliseconds maximum, P < 0.001 versus vehicle), the increases in ventricular ERP (VERP, 8 +/- 4 milliseconds) and QT interval (2 +/- 5.5 milliseconds) were small and not concentration-dependent. For azimilide, the AERP increase was less, whereas VERP and QT increases were substantially larger than with AZD7009. In vitro, AZD7009 concentration-dependently reduced Vmax and increased action potential duration (APD). ERP was increased through APD lengthening and post-repolarization refractoriness. The suppression of Vmax, but not APD prolongation, showed frequency-dependence. APD and ERP increases were more pronounced in atrial than ventricular tissue: in atria, 2 microM AZD7009 increased APD90 and ERP from 224 +/- 7 to 318 +/- 7 milliseconds and 241 +/- 7 milliseconds to 378 +/- 17 milliseconds; versus 257 +/- 5 to 283 +/- 7 milliseconds and 253 +/- 12 to 300 +/- 11 milliseconds respectively in ventricles. Thus, AZD7009 potently and predominantly increases atrial refractoriness in the dog, with actions mediated by combined effects on repolarization and the Na+-current system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".