MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007519972 · doi:10.1002/tox.20089

Acute Toxicity of copper to the threespine stickleback,Gasterosteus aculeatus

2005· article· en· W2007519972 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josh J. Gravenmier, David W. Johnston, Robert C. Santore, Wyatt Arnold

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Toxicology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGasterosteusSticklebackCopper toxicityEffluentToxicityAcute toxicityEcotoxicologyBiotic Ligand ModelCopperEnvironmental chemistrySoft waterBiologyToxicologyZoologyEcologyEnvironmental scienceChemistryFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>Environmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on characterizing the acute toxicity of copper in freshwater to the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, a small and widely distributed euryhaline fish. The threespine stickleback is used as an effluent monitoring species in both Canada and the United States, yet in some locations natural populations are listed as threatened or endangered. Four 96-h static renewal acute toxicity tests were performed in moderately hard water using U.S. EPA methods with adult fish (mean wet weight = 0.41 g/fish). The geometric mean of the 24-, 48-, 72- and 96-h LC(50)s based on measured concentrations of total copper (estimated dissolved copper in parentheses) in the test solutions were 382.2 (366.9), 278.7 (267.6), 256.6 (246.3), and 227.2 (218.1) microg Cu/L, respectively. Conservative estimates of acute toxicity thresholds, made using LC1 values, for adult threespine sticklebacks over 24-, 48-, 72- or 96-h exposure periods in moderately hard water are approximately 114.3 (109.7), 78.3 (75.2), 67.0 (64.3), and 52.4 (50.3) microg Cu/L, respectively. Test results were normalized to a range of water hardness from very soft to very hard using two U.S. EPA methods, the water hardness and the Biotic Ligand Model normalization procedures. Subsequently, interspecies sensitivity comparisons were made with aquatic animal species used in both the current and proposed U.S. EPA copper water quality criteria documents. Information reported in this study may be useful in effluent toxicity identification evaluations, ecological risk assessments and criteria development where copper is a concern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ToxicologySame topicEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyFrench-language works237,207