MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigation of the Effects of High‐Pressure Hydrogen on <scp> <scp> Pb(Zr,Ti)O <sub>3</sub> </scp> </scp> ( <scp> <scp>PZT</scp> </scp> ) Ceramics

2011· article· en· W2007531146 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Shafiei, Carmen Oprea, Tom Troczynski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMicrostructureLead zirconate titanateElectrodeHydrogenCapacitanceCeramicComposite materialFerroelectricityChemistryDielectricOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lead–zirconate–titanate Pb(Zr,Ti)O 3 ( PZT )‐based actuators are being evaluated by the automotive industry for advanced fuel injection systems, including injection of hydrogen. However, hydrogen can penetrate PZT lattice with deleterious effects on the functionality and properties of PZT . The effect of long‐term (200–1200 h) high‐pressure (100 bar) hydrogen exposure on the microstructure and electrical properties of PZT has been investigated in the present work. It is found that while the hydrogen atmosphere has only superficial effects on the microstructure of bare PZT plates, it has considerable deleterious effects on the microstructure of electrode/ PZT /electrode assembly. The degradation consisted of the development of a porous layer just beside the electrodes on the PZT surface, detachment of the electrodes from the PZT , and extensive damage to the Ag/Pd electrodes. The effect of hydrogen on the capacitance of the electrode/ PZT /electrode assembly was also studied by online monitoring of the changes in capacitance in H 2 ; no noticeable changes were observed in capacitance during the hydrogen treatment under the given conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Ceramic SocietySame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207