A fluorescence-based method coupled with Disruptor filtration for rapid detection of F <b>+</b> RNA phages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: F + RNA phages are commonly used as indicators of faecal contamination. This study evaluated a fluorescent method for the detection of F + RNA phages based on testing the phage-mediated release of β-galactosidase. Factors that may potentially interfere with phage detection were investigated, and the assay was optimized. Low numbers of F + RNA phages were detected by the fluorescent method coupled with a concentration step using a Disruptor filter. The fluorescent method, when used alone, detected 1 log PFU ml(-1) of F+RNA phages within 3 h, while 0.01 PFU ml(-1) was detected within 5 h when the method was combined with the concentration step. This is the first time to combine a fluorescent method with a filtration step by the use of Disruptor filter for rapid detection of low numbers of F + RNA phages, and this method can be adapted to detect other lytic phages infecting host cells that produce measurable enzyme activity. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: A fluorescent method coupled with Disruptor filtration was evaluated for the first time to rapidly detect low numbers of F + RNA phages. Rapid detection of F + RNA phages provides an effective way to monitor faecal contamination of environmental water and thus helps prevent contamination of fresh produce via irrigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".