The aleocharine rove beetle fauna of the Three Kings Islands, New Zealand (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae), with descriptions of two new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The aleocharine fauna of the Three Kings Islands, New Zealand, according to the current state of knowledge, comprises Aleochara watti Klimaszewski 1997, Atheta kingorum n. sp., Myllaena intermedia Erichson 1837, Neodoxa secreta (Cameron 1950) new combination, ’Ocalea’ zelandica n. sp., and Pseudopisalia turbotti Cameron 1950. All species are probably endemic to the islands, with the exception of the Palaearctic M. intermedia , which is herein reported from the Three Kings Islands for the first time. Neodoxa new name is proposed as a replacement name for the junior homonym Heterodoxa Cameron 1950 (not Malloch 1932). Lectotypes are designated for the following (original combinations in parentheses): Neodoxa secreta (Cameron 1950) ( Heterodoxa ) , Pseudopisalia turbotti Cameron 1950, as well as for the following four nominal species from the New Zealand mainland: Atheta brouni (Bernhauer and Scheerpeltz, 1926) (replacement name for A. atriceps (Broun 1880) ( Gyrophaena ), ‘Ocalea’ socialis (Broun 1880) ( Gyrophaena ) ( = crepera Broun 1894, new synonymy), and ‘O.’ fungicola (Broun 1894) ( Calodera ). All six species of Aleocharinae from the Three Kings Islands are redescribed, a key is provided, and their affinities are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".