Pathways to intrusive memories in a trauma analogue paradigm: a structural equation model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Structural equation modeling was used to develop and test an integrated model of how emotional and cognitive factors contribute to the development of intrusive memories after a distressing event. METHODS: The emotional constructs included preexisting emotion and emotional reactivity to the distressing event. Cognitive constructs included peritraumatic cognitive processing and maladaptive coping strategies. RESULTS: Using a prospective design, 148 undergraduate students viewed a distressing film and recorded their film-related intrusive memories over the following week. RESULTS: The results indicated that emotional reactivity and, to a lesser extent, preexisting emotion, predicted peritraumatic cognitive processing during the film, which in turn predicted the use of maladaptive coping strategies (i.e., rumination, thought suppression, and safety behaviors). Furthermore, emotional reactivity and maladaptive coping strategies directly predicted intrusive memories. CONCLUSIONS: The observed model supported the importance of cognitive variables central to cognitive models, placing them in a broader context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".