Impaired Baroreflex Gain in Patients with Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure variability (BPV), and baroreflex gain (BRG) at rest and during orthostatic stress in patients with clinical criteria of inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST). METHODS AND RESULTS: Beat-to-beat HRV and BPV, measured by time- and frequency-domain methods, and noninvasive BRG, calculated by cross-spectral analysis, were obtained during 10 minutes both at rest and during the stabilization phase (5-15 min) of orthostatic stress at 60 degrees in 8 patients with clinical criteria of IST and 9 healthy volunteers (CON). IST patients had a higher resting mean heart rate (78.8 +/- 5.3 vs 58.5 +/- 4.2 beats/min, P=0.01) and mean blood pressure (90.4 +/- 2.4 vs 72.0 +/- 4.2 mmHg; P=0.002). RMSSD, pNN50m, and BRG were significantly reduced in IST patients at rest. BRG during orthostatic stress (7.2 +/- 0.8 vs 20.3 (2.4 ms/mmHg, P <0.01) was significantly reduced in IST patients. Delta BRG (-16.9%+/- 11 vs -50.1%+/- 5, P=0.02) was markedly blunted during orthostatic stress in IST patients. CONCLUSION: BRG was markedly impaired both at rest and during orthostatic stress in IST patients. This alteration may be responsible for the higher resting heart rate and mean blood pressures seen at rest and may facilitate tachycardia during orthostatic stress. A primary alteration in sinus node automaticity coupled with impaired BRG determines heart rate response to orthostatic stress in patients with IST.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".