MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bioleaching of Metal-Contaminated Soil in Semicontinuous Reactor

2001· article· en· W2007676568 on OpenAlexaff
Gérald J. Zagury, K. Subba Narasiah, Rajeswar D. Tyagi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInstitut National d'OptiqueUniversité de SherbrookeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioleachingChemistryLeaching (pedology)Environmental chemistryLaboratory flaskOxidizing agentContinuous stirred-tank reactorMetalSoil contaminationBioreactorSoil waterHydraulic retention timeContaminationOxygenChemical oxygen demandPulp and paper industryEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceWastewater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, microbial leaching of heavy metals from contaminated soils with indigenous iron-oxidizing microflora has been successfully applied in flask experiments. However, the long hydraulic residence time (HRT) required and the batch mode are not well suited for an industrial scale process. Therefore, this research focused on bioleaching of Zn, Cu, and Mn from a contaminated soil in the semicontinuous mode. Metal leaching experiments were carried out in an 8 L semicontinuous stirred tank reactor (SCSTR) with a soil concentration of 100 g/L, as well as in 500 mL shake flasks. It was found that bioleaching in the SCSTR entails a reduction of treatment duration (from 10 to 2 days) and an increase in the solubilization efficiency. Metal solubilization efficiency in the SCSTR was 40% for Zn, 47% for Cu, and 34% for Mn. When the volume of the soil suspension remaining in the SCSTR between transfers was small (20% instead of 50%), corresponding to a shorter HRT (2.5 days instead of 4 days), the solubilization efficiencies were reduced. The volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient and the oxygen uptake rate were calculated in the SCSTR for both HRTs tested. The dissolved oxygen concentration below which the microflora does not grow was found to be 0.2 to 0.3 mg/L, and the concentration below which oxygen is limiting was 0.8 mg/L.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental EngineeringSame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207