Aspirin Analogues as Dual Cyclooxygenase‐2/5‐Lipoxygenase Inhibitors: Synthesis, Nitric Oxide Release, Molecular Modeling, and Biological Evaluation as Anti‐Inflammatory Agents
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analogues of aspirin were synthesized through an efficient one-step reaction in which the carboxyl group was replaced by an ethyl ester, and/or the acetoxy group was replaced by an N-substituted sulfonamide (SO(2)NHOR(2):R(2) =H, Me, CH(2)Ph) pharmacophore. These analogues were designed for evaluation as dual cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) inhibitors. In vitro COX-1/COX-2 isozyme inhibition studies identified compounds 11 (CO(2) H, SO(2)NHOH), 12 (CO(2)H, SO(2)NHOCH(2)Ph), and 16 (CO(2)Et, SO(2)NHOH) as highly potent and selective COX-2 inhibitors (IC(50) range: 0.07-0.7 μM), which exhibited appreciable in vivo anti-inflammatory activity (ED(50) range: 23.1-31.4 mg kg(-1)). Moreover, compounds 11 (IC(50) =0.2 μM) and 16 (IC(50) =0.3 μM), with a sulfohydroxamic acid (SO(2)NHOH) moiety showed potent 5-LOX inhibitory activity. Furthermore, the SO(2)NHOH moiety present in compounds 11 and 16 was found to be a good nitric oxide (NO) donor upon incubation in phosphate buffer at pH 7.4. Molecular docking studies in the active binding site of COX-2 and 5-LOX provided complementary theoretical support for the experimental biological structure-activity data acquired.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it