Ferromagnetic Coupling by Spin Polarization in a Trinuclear Copper(II) Metallacyclophane with a Triangular Cage-Like Structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of trinuclear copper(II) complexes of general formula A(6)[Cu(3)L(2)] x nH(2)O [L = benzene-1,3,5-tris(oxamate); A = Li(+) (n = 8), 1a; Na(+) (n = 11.5), 1b; and K(+) (n = 8.5), 1c] have been synthesized, and they have been structurally and magnetically characterized. X-ray diffraction on single crystals of 1c shows the presence of three square-planar copper(II)-bis(oxamato) moieties which are connected by a double benzene-1,3,5-triyl skeleton to give a unique metallacyclophane-type triangular cage. The copper basal planes are virtually orthogonal to the two benzene rings, which adopt an almost perfect face-to-face alignment. Complexes 1a-c exhibit a quartet (S = 3/2) ground spin state resulting from the moderate ferromagnetic coupling (J values in the range of +7.3 to +16.5 cm(-1)) between the three Cu(II) ions across the two benzene-1,3,5-tris(amidate) bridges [H = -J(S(1) x S(2) + S(2) x S(3) + S(3) x S(1)) with S(1) = S(2) = S(3) = S(Cu) = 1/2]. Density functional theory calculations on the S = 3/2 Cu(II)(3) ground spin state of 1c support the occurrence of a spin polarization mechanism for the propagation of the exchange interaction, as evidenced by the sign alternation of the spin density in the 1,3,5-substituted benzene spacers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".