MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007756621 · doi:10.1107/s0108767302087202

Structural relaxation between high-density and low-density amorphous ice: an X-ray and neutron diffraction study

2002· article· en· W2007756621 on OpenAlexaff
C. A. Tulk, Chris J. Benmore, D. D. Klug, J. Uquirdi, Bruno Tomberli, Jöerg C. Neuefeind, P. A. Egelstaff

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutron diffractionMaterials scienceAmorphous solidAmorphous iceDiffractionRelaxation (psychology)Ice IhX-rayCrystallographyNuclear magnetic resonanceCondensed matter physicsPhysicsOpticsChemistryMoleculeMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structure of normal phase and supercritical 11 BF3 has been investigated using neutron diffraction. The results of structural models for the normal fluid and the supercritical fluid are presented. The relation between the Lewis acidity and the structure is discussed. Comparisons are made with recent structural studies of superacidic fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of CrystallographySame topicGlass properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207