MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007765076 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22065

An experimental study of dynamic jet behaviour in a scaled cold flow spray dryer model using PIV

2014· article· en· W2007765076 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sandip K. Pawar, Ruud H. M. Abrahams, N.G. Deen, Johan T. Padding, Gert‐Jan van der Gulik, Alfred Jongsma, Fredrik Innings, J.A.M. Kuipers

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulenceMechanicsJet (fluid)Particle image velocimetryReynolds numberFlow (mathematics)Materials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Research on the dynamic flow behaviour in spray dryers has a long history. Interest in describing these flows originates from problems like roof and wall fouling. The aim of the present study is to experimentally investigate the dynamic jet behaviour and turbulent flow in a scaled‐down cold flow model of a spray dryer in order to better understand and optimize spray drying units. Dynamic jet behaviour and turbulent flow features (i.e., RMS velocities) were studied by particle image velocimetry (PIV) using water as the continuous phase. To obtain more insight in the jet dynamics, we analyzed the turning point, the width and shape, and the velocity profiles of the turbulent jet at different heights and the turbulence characteristics. We found that at higher Reynolds numbers, the jet penetrates further along the downward direction with a time‐averaged profile which is symmetric at the centre. In addition, we investigated the effect of the expansion ratio via proper orthogonal decomposition (POD). Outcomes of different characteristics of the dynamic jet, like steady, transient, regular, and complex precession, can be collapsed by proper scaling. These results can be used for validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations and facilitate the design (identification of jet operation boundaries) of new spray dryer configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207