Toxicity and clinical outcomes of paliperidone exposures reported to U.S. Poison Centers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Paliperidone is an atypical antipsychotic that was approved in the U.S. in 2006, and is also available in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Europe, and Asia. Information regarding paliperidone overdoses is limited to case reports. Serious toxicity has yet to be reported. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the toxicity of paliperidone exposures using a national poison center database. METHODS: A retrospective, observational case series of single-substance paliperidone cases reported to the National Poison Data System from 2007 to 2012 was conducted. Cases were evaluated for demographics, reason for exposure, clinical effects, treatments, disposition, and coded medical outcomes. For cases with major effects the text fields in poison center charts were evaluated to verify accuracy of coded outcome. The relationship between dose and severity of medical outcome was analyzed for acute exposure cases. RESULTS: There were 801 paliperidone cases that met inclusion criteria that included 592 persons of 13 years or greater, 67 children of 6-12 years, 140 children of less than 6 years, and 2 unknown ages. Most common reasons for exposure included: suicide attempt (39.6%), unintentional general (21.1%), therapeutic error (15.7%), and adverse drug reaction (11.9%). The most commonly observed clinical effects were drowsiness/lethargy (28.7%), tachycardia (23.3%), and dystonia (14.2%). Most patients were managed in the emergency department (40.3%) or were admitted to a health care facility (HCF) (42.7%). In 564 cases treated in a HCF, treatments included activated charcoal (25.7%), antihistamines (21.1%), and benzodiazepines (9.4%). Medical outcomes were no effect (35.0%), minor (30.8%), moderate (33.7%), and major effect (0.5%). There were no deaths. Of 491 acute exposures, dose was coded for 74.3% of exposures. There was a significant difference in the reported median dose between those with no effect (6 mg) and either minor effect (12 mg; p = 0.047) or moderate effect cases (12 mg; p = 0.020) in 91 children less than 6 years. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients experienced no or minor toxicity and were not admitted for medical care. Although a higher dose was associated with a more serious outcome in children less than 6 years, the data do not provide clear-cut triage guidelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".